Independent. No paid placements.Reviewed as findings changeEditorial policyNewsletter
The Insurance RecordAn independent record of insurance agents and brokers — licensing, appointment, and conduct, checked against real regulation

Last reviewed: 17 September 2026

Home › The Library › Producer-controlled insurer disclosure

When your insurance agent owns a piece of the insurer they're selling you

Our MGA explainer and captive-vs-independent explainer both describe ways a producer's relationship with a carrier can run deeper than a simple sales appointment. This page covers the deepest version of that: a producer who actually controls the insurer they're placing your business with. That specific arrangement has its own name, its own disclosure duty, and its own state statutes — distinct from, and not a comment on, that insurer's financial strength (see our carrier-vetting scope note on the standard page).

In short: Several states — Illinois, North Carolina, Washington, and Ohio among them — have adopted a version of the NAIC's "Business Transacted with Producer-Controlled Insurer Act" (Model #325), which requires a producer who directly or indirectly controls an insurer to deliver written notice disclosing that relationship to a prospective policyholder before the policy's effective date, once the business placed with that controlled insurer crosses a statutory threshold. The duty is disclosure of the relationship, not a rating of the insurer.

What "producer-controlled" actually means

Illinois's Producer Controlled Insurer Act (215 ILCS 107) defines a "controlling producer" as a producer that directly or indirectly controls an insurer, and applies once the gross written premium a controlling producer places with that controlled insurer in a calendar year equals or exceeds 5% of the controlled insurer's admitted assets as reported in its prior-year annual statement.[1] North Carolina (G.S. § 58-3-165), Washington (RCW 48.97.015 and 48.97.020), and Ohio (Revised Code §§ 3905.63–3905.64) each run their own versions of the same underlying NAIC model act, with the specific thresholds and mechanics set independently by each state.[2]

The disclosure duty itself

The core consumer-facing requirement under the model act is direct: before the effective date of a policy placed with a controlled insurer, the controlling producer has to deliver written notice to the prospective insured disclosing the relationship between the producer and that insurer. The model act's broader framework — separate financial-oversight requirements like an independent actuarial opinion review for the controlled insurer — exists to protect the controlled insurer's own solvency given the self-dealing risk, which is a different, carrier-level concern this site doesn't grade; the piece that's squarely about producer conduct is the disclosure itself, since it's the producer's own duty to make and the fact that's directly checkable.

Why this is a real, distinct conflict of interest

An ordinary appointed producer earns a commission for placing your business with a carrier they don't own any part of — the same commission structure our commission-disclosure explainer covers. A controlling producer has a second, deeper financial stake: placing more business with the insurer they control can benefit them as an owner, not just as a commissioned salesperson, on top of whatever commission they're paid. That second layer of incentive is exactly why the disclosure duty exists as its own, separately named requirement rather than being treated as covered by ordinary commission disclosure alone.

What this means for you

If a producer discloses, or you learn, that they control or co-own the insurer whose policy they're recommending, that disclosure is the specific, checkable fact to focus on — not a reason by itself to assume anything is wrong. This site never grades a carrier's own financial strength (see AM Best, Moody's, S&P, or Fitch's own public ratings for that), and controlling an insurer isn't itself a violation of anything. What is checkable is whether the required written disclosure was actually given to you before the policy took effect, in a state that requires one; if it wasn't, that's a specific, documentable gap worth raising with your state's Department of Insurance directly (see our complaint-filing guide).

  1. [1] Illinois Producer Controlled Insurer Act, 215 ILCS 107 — ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1256
  2. [2] NAIC Model #325; North Carolina G.S. § 58-3-165; Washington RCW 48.97.015 and 48.97.020; Ohio Rev. Code §§ 3905.63 (limits/threshold) and 3905.64 (notice to prospective insured) — content.naic.org/sites/default/files/MO325.pdf

Related